Results Summary
What was the research about?
Understanding which aspects of health and wellness are most important to patients living with HIV can help clinics improve care. Clinics often have patients complete surveys about their health and wellness. This study created new sets of survey questions for people living with HIV.
This study had two parts. In the first part, the research team asked patients living with HIV and their clinicians, such as doctors and nurses, what health and wellness topics they found important. In the second part, the team created sets of survey questions for two topics: domestic violence and social support. The team then asked patients living with HIV to answer the questions.
What were the results?
The research team found that patients living with HIV and their clinicians ranked different topics as most important. Patients highly ranked HIV stigma and social support. In contrast, clinicians highly ranked drug, alcohol, and tobacco use. Patients and clinicians agreed on the importance of some topics. These topics were depression, taking medicine as directed, HIV symptoms, and sex behaviors that increase risk for HIV transmission.
Of 1,000 patients who responded to the domestic violence questions
- 9 percent said they felt controlled by a partner in the past year
- 5 percent said they were afraid of harm from a partner
- 4 percent said a partner physically harmed them
- 3 percent said a partner forced or pressured them to have sex
Of patients who responded to the social support questions, patients with less social support reported higher levels of depression and lower quality of life than patients with more social support did.
Who was in the study?
The first part of the study included 206 patients living with HIV and 17 clinicians. The patients and clinicians were from five HIV clinics across the country. In the second part of the study, more than 1,000 patients filled out the domestic violence questions, and 680 patients filled out the social support questions. These patients were from six HIV clinics across the country.
What did the research team do?
The research team convened a patient advisory board to help guide the study. The board included three patients receiving care from clinics at the University of Washington.
In the first part of the study, the research team asked patients and clinicians to rank health topics in order of importance. The team then held 11 group discussions with other patients. These patients also ranked the topics.
In the second part of the study, the team created survey questions for two topics. The patient advisory board had suggested domestic violence because it is common and harmful. Patients in the group discussions had rated social support as highly important.
The research team looked through existing health surveys to find questions about domestic violence. The team then asked patients to read the questions to see if they understood them as intended. Next, the team changed or removed questions that weren’t clear.
To develop questions about social support, the team used a similar process. The team found so many questions from existing health surveys that they needed to shorten the list. The team used questions that research studies had linked to patient health and a group of patients had rated as most important.
The team then asked patients living with HIV from across the United States to fill out surveys during routine healthcare visits. The surveys included the domestic violence and social support questions and other questions about the patients’ health.
What were the limits of the study?
The study included patients and clinicians from HIV specialty clinics only. Results may differ for patients and clinicians from other settings, such as primary care practices.
Future research could use the survey questions from this study to see how domestic violence and social support affect patient health.
How can people use the results?
Clinicians and patients can use the survey questions about domestic violence and social support to help understand the needs of patients living with HIV.
Professional Abstract
Objective
To identify patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains that are important for people living with HIV and their clinicians and to develop measures to fill gaps in these important domains
Study Design
Design Elements | Description |
---|---|
Design | Survey question development and testing |
Data Sources and Data Sets |
Part 1: focus groups with people living with HIV and their clinicians, surveys from people living with HIV and their clinicians Part 2: literature review, interviews with people living with HIV, field test of newly developed measures |
Analytic Approach |
Part 1: survey data analysis, interview data qualitative analysis Part 2: literature review, qualitative item review |
Outcomes |
Part 1: identification of key PRO domains for people living with HIV Part 2: development of PRO measures for intimate partner violence and social support |
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) is a series of PRO measures that assess different domains of health, including well-being, function, and symptoms. The research team examined which PROMIS domains were most important to people living with HIV and their clinicians and developed measures for two new domains not in PROMIS. A patient advisory board of three people living with HIV and receiving care from the University of Washington provided input to the research team.
In the first part of the study, the research team asked 206 people living with HIV and 17 clinicians to rank 25 PRO domains in order of importance. The team also held 11 focus groups with people living with HIV to perform the same ranking exercise and discuss their responses.
In the second part of the study, the research team selected and developed measures for two domains, intimate partner violence and social support. The patient advisory panel suggested developing a measure for intimate partner violence due to its high prevalence and impact. Social support emerged as a priority in focus group discussions.
For intimate partner violence, the research team reviewed the literature to compile a list of validated PRO items, removing items that were redundant. Next, 44 people living with HIV reviewed the items. The team modified or dropped items that readers did not understand as intended. The final measure included four items.
For social support, the team conducted a similar literature and item review process. Because of the large number of items in the literature, the team reduced the item set based on interviews with 32 people living with HIV and then included only items that were closely linked to health outcomes. Finally, 24 people living with HIV ranked the items in order of importance. The final measure had eight items.
At six clinics across the country, the team administered the two measures, along with other PRO measures, to people living with HIV. More than 1,000 people completed the intimate partner violence items, and 680 completed the social support items.
Results
Some PRO domain priorities differed between people living with HIV and their clinicians. People living with HIV highly ranked domains related to social context, such as HIV stigma and social support, and clinicians highly ranked domains that are more actionable for clinical interventions, such as drug, alcohol, and tobacco use. People living with HIV and clinicians ranked some of the same topics as important, including depression, taking medicine as directed, HIV symptoms, and risky sexual behavior.
Of the first 1,000 people living with HIV who responded to the intimate partner violence measure, 9% reported feeling controlled in the past year, 5% reported being afraid of harm, 4% reported experiencing nonsexual physical harm, and 3% reported being pressured or forced to engage in sexual activity.
For the social support measure, respondents with lower levels of social support were more likely to have poorer health outcomes, such as higher levels of depression and lower levels of health-related quality of life compared with respondents with higher levels of social support.
Limitations
This study included people living with HIV and clinicians only at HIV clinics in academic settings. Results may differ for people living with HIV and clinicians in other settings.
Conclusions and Relevance
Because people living with HIV and their clinicians may have different healthcare priorities, clinicians may wish to confirm with their patients what healthcare goals are most important to them. Clinicians can use the two new PRO measures developed in this study to understand the needs of their patients related to social support and intimate partner violence.
Future Research Needs
Future research could use the surveys developed in this study to investigate how social support and domestic violence affect the health of people living with HIV.
Final Research Report
View this project's final research report.
Journal Citations
Results of This Project
Related Journal Citations
Peer-Review Summary
Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also assesses how the project addressed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts read a draft report of the research and provide comments about the report. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. These reviewers cannot have conflicts of interest with the study.
The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve descriptions of the conduct of the study or to clarify the connection between results and conclusions. Sometimes, awardees revise their draft reports twice or more to address all of the reviewers’ comments.
Peer review identified the following strengths and limitations in the report:
- The reviewers found the report to be interesting and important. They were especially complimentary about the study’s focus on patient-reported alcohol use and abuse among people with HIV.
- The reviewers asked for an expansion of the researchers’ rationale for having an additional focus on patient-reported intimate partner violence (IPV) and social support for people with HIV. The researchers added this justification, noting in their response that patients who rated their major concerns did not think IPV was a significant issue, despite evidence that IPV has negative health effects for people in this population. The researchers added that the topic of social support came up often in qualitative interviews with patients.